↓ Skip to main content

Seroprevalence of varicella-zoster virus and predictors for seronegativity in the Amsterdam adult population

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seroprevalence of varicella-zoster virus and predictors for seronegativity in the Amsterdam adult population
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-12-140
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gini GC van Rijckevorsel, Marjolein Damen, Gerard J Sonder, Maarten F Schim van der Loeff, Anneke van den Hoek

Abstract

In the Netherlands, infection with varicella-zoster virus (VZV) is considered a benign common childhood illness and routine vaccination against VZV is not done. In 1995 it was estimated that 98-100% of the adult Dutch general population is immune, yet the estimate is based on a database in which a relative small number of people of non-Dutch ethnic origin were represented. As the city of Amsterdam has large immigrant communities originating from various subtropical and tropical countries, such as Morocco, Surinam, and Turkey with probably lower VZV transmission, this study aimed to estimate the seroprevalence of VZV IgG antibodies (anti-VZV) among various ethnic groups in Amsterdam, and identify factors associated with seronegative VZV status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 26%
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Other 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 43%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,912,452
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,218
of 7,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,165
of 164,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#21
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.