↓ Skip to main content

Early detection of tuberculosis through community-based active case finding in Cambodia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early detection of tuberculosis through community-based active case finding in Cambodia
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mao Tan Eang, Peou Satha, Rajendra Prasad Yadav, Fukushi Morishita, Nobuyuki Nishikiori, Pieter van-Maaren, Catharina Lambregts-van Weezenbeek

Abstract

Since 2005, Cambodia's national tuberculosis programme has been conducting active case finding (ACF) with mobile radiography units, targeting household contacts of TB patients in poor and vulnerable communities in addition to routine passive case finding (PCF). This paper examines the differences in the demographic characteristics, smear grades, and treatment outcomes of pulmonary TB cases detected through both active and passive case finding to determine if ACF could contribute to early case finding, considering associated project costs for ACF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Cambodia 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Rwanda 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 229 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 19%
Student > Master 44 19%
Student > Postgraduate 19 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 6%
Other 47 20%
Unknown 50 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 10%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 2%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 65 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,289,071
of 23,504,998 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,744
of 15,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,631
of 165,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#58
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.