You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measurement of asthma control according to global initiative for asthma guidelines: a comparison with the asthma control questionnaire
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Respiratory Research, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1465-9921-13-50 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José María Olaguibel, Santiago Quirce, Berta Juliá, Cristina Fernández, Ana María Fortuna, Jesús Molina, Vicente Plaza, on behalf of the MAGIC Study Group |
| Abstract |
Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) is a validated tool to measure asthma control. Cut-off points that best discriminate "well-controlled" or "not well-controlled" asthma have been suggested from the analysis of a large randomized clinical trial but they may not be adequate for daily clinical practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Argentina | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 174 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 13% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 58 | 32% |
| Unknown | 36 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 49% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,376,246
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#109
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,569
of 177,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.