You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telehealth in rural and remote emergency departments: a systematic review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01349-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina Tsou, Suzanne Robinson, James Boyd, Andrew Jamieson, Robert Blakeman, Kylie Bosich, Justin Yeung, Stephanie Waters, Delia Hendrie |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 50 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 53 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,859,656
of 23,203,401 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#996
of 2,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,651
of 374,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#38
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,203,401 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.