You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Enhancing the comparability of costing methods: cross-country variability in the prices of non-traded inputs to health programmes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, April 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-7547-4-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Benjamin Johns, Taghreed Adam, David B Evans |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 33 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 26% |
Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 21% |
Unknown | 5 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 35% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,610,236
of 23,203,401 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#227
of 432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,418
of 66,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,203,401 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.