↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of single dose of gentamicin in combination with metronidazole versus multiple doses for prevention of post-caesarean infection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of single dose of gentamicin in combination with metronidazole versus multiple doses for prevention of post-caesarean infection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-13-89
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fadhili M Lyimo, Anthony N Massinde, Benson R Kidenya, Evelyne Konje, Stephen E Mshana

Abstract

Caesarean section is a commonly performed operation worldwide. It has been found to increase rates of maternal infectious morbidities more than five times when compared to vaginal delivery. Provision of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics 30 to 60 minutes prior to caesarean section has been found to reduce post-caesarean infection tremendously. Many centers recommend provision of a single dose of antibiotics, as repeated doses offer no benefit over a single dose. At Bugando Medical Centre post caesarean infection is among the top five causes of admission at the post-natal ward. Unfortunately, there is no consistent protocol for the administration of antibiotic prophylaxis to patients who are designated for caesarean section. Common practice and generally the clinician's preference are to provide repeated dosages of antibiotic prophylaxis after caesarean section to most of the patients. This study aims to determine the comparative efficacy of a single dose of gentamicin in combination with metronidazole versus multiple doses for prevention of post caesarean infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Rwanda 1 1%
Ethiopia 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Unknown 91 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Student > Postgraduate 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 25 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 46%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 27 29%