↓ Skip to main content

Inference of kinship using spatial distributions of SNPs for genome-wide association studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inference of kinship using spatial distributions of SNPs for genome-wide association studies
Published in
BMC Genomics, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-2696-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyokyeong Lee, Liang Chen

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) are powerful in identifying genetic loci which cause complex traits of common diseases. However, it is well known that inappropriately accounting for pedigree or population structure leads to spurious associations. GWASs have often encountered increased type I error rates due to the correlated genotypes of cryptically related individuals or subgroups. Therefore, accurate pedigree information is crucial for successful GWASs. We propose a distance-based method KIND to estimate kinship coefficients among individuals. Our method utilizes the spatial distribution of SNPs in the genome that represents how far each minor-allele variant is located from its neighboring minor-allele variants. The SNP distribution of each individual was presented in a feature vector in Euclidean space, and then the kinship coefficient was inferred from the two vectors of each individual pair. We demonstrate that the distance information can measure the similarity of genetic variants of individuals accurately and efficiently. We applied our method to a synthetic data set and two real data sets (i.e. the HapMap phase III and the 1000 genomes data). We investigated the estimation accuracy of kinship coefficients not only within homogeneous populations but also for a population with extreme stratification. Our method KIND usually produces more accurate and more robust kinship coefficient estimates than existing methods especially for populations with extreme stratification. It can serve as an important and very efficient tool for GWASs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 27%
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Mathematics 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2016.
All research outputs
#14,851,946
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,145
of 10,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,888
of 333,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#124
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,664 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.