↓ Skip to main content

Microflora of the penile skin-lined neovagina of transsexual women

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 3,524)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
396 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microflora of the penile skin-lined neovagina of transsexual women
Published in
BMC Microbiology, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-9-102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven Weyers, Hans Verstraelen, Jan Gerris, Stan Monstrey, Guido dos Santos Lopes Santiago, Bart Saerens, Ellen De Backer, Geert Claeys, Mario Vaneechoutte, Rita Verhelst

Abstract

The microflora of the penile skin-lined neovagina in male-to-female transsexuals is a recently created microbial niche which thus far has been characterized only to a very limited extent. Yet the knowledge of this microflora can be considered as essential to the follow-up of transsexual women. The primary objective of this study was to map the neo-vaginal microflora in a group of 50 transsexual women for whom a neovagina was constructed by means of the inverted penile skin flap technique. Secondary objectives were to describe possible correlations of this microflora with multiple patients' characteristics, such as sexual orientation, the incidence of vaginal irritation and malodorous vaginal discharge.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 396 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 6 9%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 13 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 345. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#96,549
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#2
of 3,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166
of 108,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,524 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.