↓ Skip to main content

Gaps in the evidence for prevention and treatment of maternal anaemia: a review of systematic reviews

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gaps in the evidence for prevention and treatment of maternal anaemia: a review of systematic reviews
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-12-56
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqui A Parker, Filipa Barroso, Simon J Stanworth, Helen Spiby, Sally Hopewell, Carolyn J Doree, Mary J Renfrew, Shubha Allard

Abstract

Anaemia, in particular due to iron deficiency, is common in pregnancy with associated negative outcomes for mother and infant. However, there is evidence of significant variation in management. The objectives of this review of systematic reviews were to analyse and summarise the evidence base, identify gaps in the evidence and develop a research agenda for this important component of maternity care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Nigeria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 97 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 10%
Other 8 8%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 26 26%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 13%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Unspecified 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 27 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2014.
All research outputs
#5,930,458
of 23,876,482 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,497
of 4,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,995
of 166,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#10
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,876,482 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.