You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Minimal important differences for fatigue patient reported outcome measures—a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-016-0167-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Åsa Nordin, Charles Taft, Åsa Lundgren-Nilsson, Anna Dencker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Australia | 1 | 25% |
France | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 166 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 16% |
Researcher | 21 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
Other | 29 | 17% |
Unknown | 39 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Psychology | 6 | 4% |
Other | 27 | 16% |
Unknown | 45 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,296,227
of 23,986,470 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#951
of 2,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,730
of 341,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,986,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.