| Title |
Shining a light on the evidence for hydroxychloroquine in SARS-CoV-2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-02894-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas E. Ingraham, David Boulware, Matthew A. Sparks, Timothy Schacker, Bradley Benson, Jeffrey A. Sparks, Thomas Murray, John Connett, Jeffrey G. Chipman, Anthony Charles, Christopher J. Tignanelli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 37% |
| France | 2 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 229 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 21% |
| Researcher | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 4% |
| Professor | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 97 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 21% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 30 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 103 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,720,851
of 25,473,687 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,351
of 6,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,063
of 408,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#92
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,473,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.