↓ Skip to main content

Scaling-up an evidence-based intervention for osteoarthritis in real-world settings: a pragmatic evaluation using the RE-AIM framework

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science Communications, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 226)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scaling-up an evidence-based intervention for osteoarthritis in real-world settings: a pragmatic evaluation using the RE-AIM framework
Published in
Implementation Science Communications, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s43058-020-00032-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Walker, Annette Boaz, Amber Gibney, Zoe Zambelli, Michael V. Hurley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Lecturer 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 2 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 15%
Computer Science 2 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,320,489
of 19,496,717 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#15
of 226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,841
of 289,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,496,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them