↓ Skip to main content

Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Imaging in clinical trials: a patient-led questionnaire study to assess impact of imaging regimes on patient participation
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40900-020-00195-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine May, Martin Lee, Monica Jefford, Ana Ribeiro, Alison Macdonald, Veronica Morgan, Marianne Usher, Nandita M. de Souza

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Unspecified 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2020.
All research outputs
#15,606,277
of 23,204,238 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#363
of 389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,807
of 377,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,204,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.