You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Step-down from high dose fixed combination therapy in asthma patients: a randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Respiratory Research, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1465-9921-13-54 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alberto Papi, Gabriele Nicolini, Nunzio Crimi, Leonardo Fabbri, Dario Olivieri, Andrea Rossi, Pierluigi Paggiaro |
Abstract |
Asthma guidelines suggest that therapy can be reduced once asthma is controlled. Despite these recommendations, asthmatic patients are seldom stepped down in clinical practice, and questions remain about when and how to reduce asthma therapy. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate lung function and asthma control in patients who were stepped down from the highest recommended dose of inhaled corticosteroid/long acting β2 agonist combination therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
Canada | 1 | 9% |
Australia | 1 | 9% |
Argentina | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Tunisia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 19% |
Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 21% |
Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 50% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 15 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2015.
All research outputs
#6,443,331
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#774
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,298
of 177,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.