↓ Skip to main content

Unsolved matters in leprosy: a descriptive review and call for further research

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 625)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unsolved matters in leprosy: a descriptive review and call for further research
Published in
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12941-016-0149-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Franco-Paredes, Alfonso J. Rodriguez-Morales

Abstract

Leprosy, a chronic mycobacterial infection caused by Mycobacterium leprae, is an infectious disease that has ravaged human societies throughout millennia. This ancestral pathogen causes disfiguring cutaneous lesions, peripheral nerve injury, ostearticular deformity, limb loss and dysfunction, blindness and stigma. Despite ongoing efforts in interrupting leprosy transmission, large numbers of new cases are persistently identified in many endemic areas. Moreover, at the time of diagnosis, most newly identified cases have considerable neurologic disability. Many challenges remain in our understanding of the epidemiology of leprosy including: (a) the precise mode and route of transmission; (b) the socioeconomic, environmental, and behavioral factors that promote its transmission; and

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 205 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Student > Master 27 13%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 60 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 4%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 75 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,824,627
of 23,724,077 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#45
of 625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,172
of 335,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,724,077 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.