You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The use of a task through virtual reality in cerebral palsy using two different interaction devices (concrete and abstract) – a cross-sectional randomized study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-020-00689-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andréa Fernanda Leal, Talita Dias da Silva, Priscila Bianchi Lopes, Shayan Bahadori, Luciano Vieira de Araújo, Murillo Vinicius Brandão da Costa, Íbis Ariana Peña de Moraes, Ricardo Henrique Marques, Tania Brusque Crocetta, Luiz Carlos de Abreu, Carlos Bandeira de Mello Monteiro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 75% |
| Brazil | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 177 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 6% |
| Researcher | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 15% |
| Unknown | 87 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 14% |
| Unknown | 85 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,096,060
of 23,204,238 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#593
of 1,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,336
of 377,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,204,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.