↓ Skip to main content

Global health partnerships: building multi-national collaborations to achieve lasting improvements in maternal and neonatal health

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global health partnerships: building multi-national collaborations to achieve lasting improvements in maternal and neonatal health
Published in
Globalization and Health, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12992-016-0159-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rohit Ramaswamy, Brianne Kallam, Dragica Kopic, Borislava Pujic, Medge D. Owen

Abstract

In response to health care challenges worldwide, extensive funding has been channeled to the world's most vulnerable health systems. Funding alone is not sufficient to address the complex issues and challenges plaguing these health systems. To see lasting improvement in maternal and infant health outcomes in the developing world, a global commitment to the sharing of knowledge and resources through international partnerships is critical. But partnerships that merely introduce western medical techniques and protocols to low resource settings, without heeding the local contexts, are misguided and unsustainable. Forming partnerships with mutual respect, shared vision, and collaborative effort is needed to ensure that all parties, irrespective of whether they belong to resource rich or resource poor settings, learn from each other so that meaningful and sustained system strengthening can take place. In this paper, we describe the partnership building model of an international NGO, Kybele, which is committed to achieving childbirth safety through sustained partnerships in low resource settings. The Kybele model adapts generic stages of successful partnerships documented in the literature to four principles relevant to Kybele's work. A multiple-case study approach is used to demonstrate how the model is applied in different country settings. The four principle of Kybele's partnership model are robust drivers of successful partnerships in diverse country settings. Much has been written about the need for multi-country partnerships to achieve sustainable outcomes in global health, but few papers in the literature describe how this has been achieved in practice. A strong champion, support and engagement of stakeholders, co-creation of solutions with partners, and involvement of partners in the delivery of solutions are all requirements for successful and sustained partnerships.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Unknown 126 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 19%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 32%
Social Sciences 17 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2016.
All research outputs
#4,541,886
of 23,327,904 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#647
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,112
of 334,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,327,904 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.