You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A radiographic analysis of tooth morphology following the use of a novel cyclical force device in orthodontics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Head & Face Medicine, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-160x-7-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chung H. Kau |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 68% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,610,424
of 23,204,238 outputs
Outputs from Head & Face Medicine
#53
of 335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,867
of 121,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Head & Face Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,204,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 335 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them