You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Biosignals learning and synthesis using deep neural networks
|
---|---|
Published in |
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12938-017-0405-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Belo, João Rodrigues, João R. Vaz, Pedro Pezarat-Correia, Hugo Gamboa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 22% |
Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Researcher | 4 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 29 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 19 | 22% |
Computer Science | 11 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 9% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Unknown | 32 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,610,424
of 23,204,238 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#213
of 828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,735
of 320,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,204,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 828 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.