You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative analysis of human and mouse immunoglobulin variable heavy regions from IMGT/LIGM-DB with IMGT/HighV-QUEST
|
---|---|
Published in |
Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1742-4682-11-30 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bin Shi, Long Ma, Xiaoyan He, Xiaomei Wang, Peng Wang, Li Zhou, Xinsheng Yao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 123 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 36 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
Other | 9 | 7% |
Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 12% |
Unknown | 20 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 31% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 29% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 19 | 15% |
Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 2% |
Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,610,424
of 23,205,257 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#99
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,225
of 228,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,205,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.