↓ Skip to main content

Clinical determinants for fatality of 44,672 patients with COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
Title
Clinical determinants for fatality of 44,672 patients with COVID-19
Published in
Critical Care, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-02902-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guangtong Deng, Mingzhu Yin, Xiang Chen, Furong Zeng

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 256 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 14%
Researcher 35 14%
Student > Master 30 12%
Other 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 56 22%
Unknown 65 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 83 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2021.
All research outputs
#823,473
of 18,263,379 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#727
of 5,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,335
of 287,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,263,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them