↓ Skip to main content

Microdialysis study of imipenem distribution in muscle and lung extracellular fluids of infected rats

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microdialysis study of imipenem distribution in muscle and lung extracellular fluids of infected rats
Published in
Critical Care, March 2006
DOI 10.1186/cc4443
Authors

C Dahyot, S Marchand, L Pessini, I Lamarche, W Couet, B Debeane, O Mimoz

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,509
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,399
of 85,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#10
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.