You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influence of surface topography on the human epithelial cell response to micropatterned substrates with convex and concave architectures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biological Engineering, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1754-1611-8-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mee-Hae Kim, Yoshiko Sawada, Masahito Taya, Masahiro Kino-oka |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 31% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 14% |
| Engineering | 10 | 12% |
| Materials Science | 9 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,803,842
of 23,205,257 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Engineering
#74
of 271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,072
of 229,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Engineering
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,205,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.