↓ Skip to main content

Arrow plot: a new graphical tool for selecting up and down regulated genes and genes differentially expressed on sample subgroups

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Arrow plot: a new graphical tool for selecting up and down regulated genes and genes differentially expressed on sample subgroups
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-13-147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carina Silva-Fortes, Maria Antónia Amaral Turkman, Lisete Sousa

Abstract

A common task in analyzing microarray data is to determine which genes are differentially expressed across two (or more) kind of tissue samples or samples submitted under experimental conditions. Several statistical methods have been proposed to accomplish this goal, generally based on measures of distance between classes. It is well known that biological samples are heterogeneous because of factors such as molecular subtypes or genetic background that are often unknown to the experimenter. For instance, in experiments which involve molecular classification of tumors it is important to identify significant subtypes of cancer. Bimodal or multimodal distributions often reflect the presence of subsamples mixtures. Consequently, there can be genes differentially expressed on sample subgroups which are missed if usual statistical approaches are used. In this paper we propose a new graphical tool which not only identifies genes with up and down regulations, but also genes with differential expression in different subclasses, that are usually missed if current statistical methods are used. This tool is based on two measures of distance between samples, namely the overlapping coefficient (OVL) between two densities and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The methodology proposed here was implemented in the open-source R software.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 44 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 37%
Computer Science 8 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Mathematics 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2012.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#6,459
of 7,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,773
of 165,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#78
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.