↓ Skip to main content

Molecular analysis of mucopolysaccharidosis type I in Tunisia: identification of novel mutation and eight Novel polymorphisms

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular analysis of mucopolysaccharidosis type I in Tunisia: identification of novel mutation and eight Novel polymorphisms
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, April 2011
DOI 10.1186/1746-1596-6-39
Pubmed ID
Authors

Latifa Chkioua, Souhir Khedhiri, Asma Kassab, Amina Bibi, Salima Ferchichi, Roseline Froissart, Christine Vianey-Saban, Sandrine Laradi, Abdelhedi Miled

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 32%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Computer Science 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,610,760
of 23,205,257 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#231
of 1,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,811
of 111,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,205,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.