↓ Skip to main content

Quantification of circulating endothelial and progenitor cells: comparison of quantitative PCR and four-channel flow cytometry

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantification of circulating endothelial and progenitor cells: comparison of quantitative PCR and four-channel flow cytometry
Published in
BMC Research Notes, August 2008
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-1-71
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Steurer, Johann Kern, Matthias Zitt, Albert Amberger, Monika Bauer, Günther Gastl, Gerold Untergasser, Eberhard Gunsilius

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Italy 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 52 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Other 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 6 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,376
of 4,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,014
of 95,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.