You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vitro, but not in vivo, reversibility of peritoneal macrophages activation during experimental acute pancreatitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Immunology, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2172-10-42 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabrina Gea-Sorlí, Daniel Closa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 11% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 36% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Immunology
#81
of 624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,889
of 121,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Immunology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them