You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Flexible combination of multiple diagnostic biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-015-0085-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tu Xu, Yixin Fang, Alan Rong, Junhui Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Researcher | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 18% |
Mathematics | 1 | 9% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 9% |
Engineering | 1 | 9% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,610,760
of 23,205,257 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,112
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,043
of 285,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,205,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.