You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Selecting high-quality negative samples for effectively predicting protein-RNA interactions
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Systems Biology, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12918-017-0390-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhanzhan Cheng, Kai Huang, Yang Wang, Hui Liu, Jihong Guan, Shuigeng Zhou |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 24% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Researcher | 2 | 10% |
Professor | 2 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 5 | 24% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 19% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Engineering | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,611,089
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#314
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,581
of 308,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.