↓ Skip to main content

Suspicion and treatment of severe sepsis. An overview of the prehospital chain of care

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Suspicion and treatment of severe sepsis. An overview of the prehospital chain of care
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1757-7241-20-42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johan Herlitz, Angela Bång, Birgitta Wireklint-Sundström, Christer Axelsson, Anders Bremer, Magnus Hagiwara, Anders Jonsson, Lars Lundberg, Björn-Ove Suserud, Lars Ljungström

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition where the risk of death has been reported to be even higher than that associated with the major complications of atherosclerosis, i.e. myocardial infarction and stroke. In all three conditions, early treatment could limit organ dysfunction and thereby improve the prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 118 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 17%
Student > Master 15 12%
Researcher 14 11%
Other 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 22%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 22 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2014.
All research outputs
#4,251,228
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#427
of 1,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,820
of 177,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.