↓ Skip to main content

Accurate confidence intervals for risk difference in meta-analysis with rare events

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accurate confidence intervals for risk difference in meta-analysis with rare events
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12874-020-00954-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tao Jiang, Baixin Cao, Guogen Shan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Unspecified 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 9%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Psychology 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#18,059,538
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,710
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,985
of 377,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#63
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.