You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An automated aquatic rack system for rearing marine invertebrates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Biology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12915-020-00772-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Q. Henry, Maryna P. Lesoway, Kimberly J. Perry |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 22% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 22 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 13 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 31% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,297,302
of 23,837,558 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biology
#354
of 2,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,078
of 383,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biology
#13
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,837,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.