↓ Skip to main content

How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
79 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review
Published in
Implementation Science, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13012-020-0978-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Zamboni, Ulrika Baker, Mukta Tyagi, Joanna Schellenberg, Zelee Hill, Claudia Hanson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 268 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 10%
Researcher 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 105 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 12%
Social Sciences 20 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 4%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 116 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2021.
All research outputs
#844,776
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#88
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,103
of 414,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.