You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A novel conceptual model and heuristic tool to strengthen understanding and capacities for health inequalities research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-020-00559-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucinda Cash-Gibson, Matthew Harris, Germán Guerra, Joan Benach |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Ireland | 1 | 14% |
| South Africa | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,931,930
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#442
of 1,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,430
of 381,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#20
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.