You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Associations of loneliness and social isolation with cardiovascular and metabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01369-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adriano Winterton, Linn Rødevand, Lars T. Westlye, Nils Eiel Steen, Ole A. Andreassen, Daniel S. Quintana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 6 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 8% |
| China | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,047,960
of 24,995,611 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#984
of 2,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,470
of 385,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#36
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,995,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,874 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.