You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Financing strategies to improve essential public health equalization and its effects in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12939-016-0482-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Li Yang, Li Sun, Liankui Wen, Huyang Zhang, Chenyang Li, Kara Hanson, Hai Fang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 204 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 21% |
| Researcher | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 16% |
| Unknown | 67 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 13 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 75 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,386,298
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#629
of 2,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,051
of 429,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#16
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.