↓ Skip to main content

Urticaria: recommendations from the Italian Society of Allergology, Asthma and Clinical Immunology and the Italian Society of Allergological, Occupational and Environmental Dermatology

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Molecular Allergy, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 216)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urticaria: recommendations from the Italian Society of Allergology, Asthma and Clinical Immunology and the Italian Society of Allergological, Occupational and Environmental Dermatology
Published in
Clinical and Molecular Allergy, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12948-020-00123-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eustachio Nettis, Caterina Foti, Marina Ambrifi, Ilaria Baiardini, Leonardo Bianchi, Alessandro Borghi, Marco Caminati, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Marco Casciaro, Laura Colli, Giselda Colombo, Monica Corazza, Antonio Cristaudo, Giulia De Feo, Ornella De Pita’, Mario Di Gioacchino, Elisabetta Di Leo, Filippo Fassio, Sebastiano Gangemi, Alessia Gatta, Katharina Hansel, Enrico Heffler, Cristoforo Incorvaia, Maddalena Napolitano, Cataldo Patruno, Silvia Peveri, Paolo Daniele Pigatto, Cristina Quecchia, Anna Radice, Giuseppe Alvise Ramirez, Paolo Romita, Franco Rongioletti, Oliviero Rossi, Eleonora Savi, Gianenrico Senna, Massimo Triggiani, Myriam Zucca, Enrico Maggi, Luca Stingeni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Librarian 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 34 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 36 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,125,361
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Molecular Allergy
#37
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,969
of 415,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Molecular Allergy
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.