↓ Skip to main content

Targeting histone methyltransferases and demethylases in clinical trials for cancer therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epigenetics, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
336 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
430 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Targeting histone methyltransferases and demethylases in clinical trials for cancer therapy
Published in
Clinical Epigenetics, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13148-016-0223-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ludovica Morera, Michael Lübbert, Manfred Jung

Abstract

The term epigenetics is defined as heritable changes in gene expression that are not due to alterations of the DNA sequence. In the last years, it has become more and more evident that dysregulated epigenetic regulatory processes have a central role in cancer onset and progression. In contrast to DNA mutations, epigenetic modifications are reversible and, hence, suitable for pharmacological interventions. Reversible histone methylation is an important process within epigenetic regulation, and the investigation of its role in cancer has led to the identification of lysine methyltransferases and demethylases as promising targets for new anticancer drugs. In this review, we describe those enzymes and their inhibitors that have already reached the first stages of clinical trials in cancer therapy, namely the histone methyltransferases DOT1L and EZH2 as well as the demethylase LSD1.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 426 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 20%
Researcher 63 15%
Student > Master 51 12%
Student > Postgraduate 42 10%
Student > Bachelor 41 10%
Other 58 13%
Unknown 88 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 155 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 17%
Chemistry 35 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 6%
Other 23 5%
Unknown 91 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,197,282
of 23,883,950 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epigenetics
#54
of 1,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,741
of 338,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epigenetics
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,883,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.