↓ Skip to main content

4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance for monitoring of aortic valve repair in bicuspid aortic valve disease

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance for monitoring of aortic valve repair in bicuspid aortic valve disease
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12968-020-00608-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Lenz, Johannes Petersen, Christoph Riedel, Julius M. Weinrich, Hendrik Kooijman, Bjoern P. Schoennagel, Gerhard Adam, Yskert von Kodolitsch, Hermann Reichenspurner, Evaldas Girdauskas, Peter Bannas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Lecturer 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 24 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 32%
Engineering 5 9%
Unspecified 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 27 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,831,376
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#481
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,062
of 409,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#12
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.