You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A rapid and sensitive method to assess seed longevity through accelerated aging in an invasive plant species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-020-00607-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erola Fenollosa, Laia Jené, Sergi Munné-Bosch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,867,042
of 23,575,882 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#289
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,389
of 384,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#16
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.