| Title |
Our recommendations for acute management of COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-02930-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesco Mojoli, Silvia Mongodi, Anita Orlando, Eric Arisi, Marco Pozzi, Luca Civardi, Guido Tavazzi, Fausto Baldanti, Raffaele Bruno, Giorgio Antonio Iotti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Peru | 2 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 142 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 27% |
| Unknown | 40 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 53 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,510,431
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,334
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,989
of 415,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#54
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.