↓ Skip to main content

Microarray test results should not be compensated for multiplicity of gene contents

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microarray test results should not be compensated for multiplicity of gene contents
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-5-s2-s6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomokazu Konishi

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 21%
Computer Science 2 14%
Mathematics 1 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,460,574
of 17,673,294 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#188
of 1,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,697
of 285,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,673,294 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,116 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them