| Title |
COVID-19 and ECMO: the interplay between coagulation and inflammation—a narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-02925-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariusz Kowalewski, Dario Fina, Artur Słomka, Giuseppe Maria Raffa, Gennaro Martucci, Valeria Lo Coco, Maria Elena De Piero, Marco Ranucci, Piotr Suwalski, Roberto Lorusso |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 21% |
| Spain | 7 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Italy | 4 | 5% |
| India | 4 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Angola | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 54 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 25% |
| Scientists | 7 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 436 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 436 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 9% |
| Other | 37 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 79 | 18% |
| Unknown | 197 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 146 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 3% |
| Engineering | 9 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 8% |
| Unknown | 206 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#681,238
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#464
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,079
of 415,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#20
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.