You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Study of active neighborhoods in Detroit (StAND): study protocol for a natural experiment evaluating the health benefits of ecological restoration of parks
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-08716-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amber L. Pearson, Karin A. Pfeiffer, Joseph Gardiner, Teresa Horton, Rachel T. Buxton, Ruth F. Hunter, Victoria Breeze, Thomas McDade |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Ireland | 1 | 25% |
Australia | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 15% |
Researcher | 15 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
Professor | 4 | 3% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Unknown | 45 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
Psychology | 8 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 8 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Other | 24 | 21% |
Unknown | 52 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2020.
All research outputs
#13,322,891
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,334
of 15,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,622
of 382,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#239
of 395 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 395 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.