↓ Skip to main content

Which interactions matter in economic evaluations? A systematic review and simulation study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Which interactions matter in economic evaluations? A systematic review and simulation study
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12874-020-00978-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen Dakin, Alastair Gray

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 56%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,115,773
of 20,492,977 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#938
of 1,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,053
of 295,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,492,977 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them