↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of thrombosis and bleeding at diagnosis of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of thrombosis and bleeding at diagnosis of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms
Published in
BMC Cancer, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12885-019-5387-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tarinee Rungjirajittranon, Weerapat Owattanapanich, Patompong Ungprasert, Noppadol Siritanaratkul, Theera Ruchutrakool

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 113 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Researcher 13 12%
Other 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 34 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Unspecified 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 37 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2020.
All research outputs
#20,616,427
of 23,206,358 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#6,575
of 8,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304,642
of 353,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#139
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,206,358 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.