You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Engaging with stakeholders to inform the development of a decision-support tool for the NHS health check programme: qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-020-05268-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lirije Hyseni, Maria Guzman-Castillo, Chris Kypridemos, Brendan Collins, Ellen Schwaller, Simon Capewell, Angela Boland, Rumona Dickson, Martin O’Flaherty, Kay Gallacher, Peter Hale, Ffion Lloyd-Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#17,113,100
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,268
of 8,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,209
of 420,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#163
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.