↓ Skip to main content

Novel wearable and contactless monitoring devices to identify deteriorating patients in the clinical setting: a systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Novel wearable and contactless monitoring devices to identify deteriorating patients in the clinical setting: a systematic review protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13643-020-01370-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Y. Chan, John McNeil, Tam Nguyen, Nicholas Ryan, Ingrid Hopper

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Other 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 19 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 19 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2021.
All research outputs
#5,860,246
of 23,207,489 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#996
of 2,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,933
of 382,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#38
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,207,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.