You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Population based study of genital Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence and associated factors in Norway: A cross sectional study
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2012
Hilde Kløvstad, Andrej Grjibovski, Preben Aavitsland
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||5||83%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||15||31%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||6%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||17||35%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||5||10%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||3||6%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||2||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2013.
All research outputs
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
of 7,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 164,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.