You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Obtaining and managing data sets for individual participant data meta-analysis: scoping review and practical guide
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-00964-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Ventresca, Holger J. Schünemann, Fergus Macbeth, Mike Clarke, Lehana Thabane, Gareth Griffiths, Simon Noble, David Garcia, Maura Marcucci, Alfonso Iorio, Qi Zhou, Mark Crowther, Elie A. Akl, Gary H. Lyman, Viktoria Gloy, Marcello DiNisio, Matthias Briel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 18% |
| Canada | 7 | 18% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 3 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Kazakhstan | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 55% |
| Scientists | 11 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 25% |
| Unknown | 19 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,254,911
of 24,323,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#144
of 2,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,578
of 390,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#8
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,323,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.